Prediction of Ali Yazdani [] vs Daniel Uta [] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W W W L W L
Form
W W L L W L W W W LHead-To-Head: Yazdani 1 - 0 Uta
They have played 3 sets in total, with Yazdani winning 2 and Uta winning 1. The last match between Yazdani and Uta was at the M15 Antalya, 03-11-2024, Q1 round, Clay with Ali Yazdani getting the victory 6-3 4-6 10-8.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ali Yazdani | 1 |
| Daniel Uta | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 4-6 10-8 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 20 | Games Won | 17 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ali Yazdani vs Daniel Uta Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Yazdani 1 - 0 Uta
Editorial Prediction:
Ali Yazdani Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Bekkhan Atlangeriev
Player
Ali Yazdani
100%
(
3 of
3)
1st Serve %
56%
(
5 of
9)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
67%
(
2 of
3)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
7
Total Points Won
5
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Marlon Vankan
Player
Ali Yazdani
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
70%
(
50 of
71)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 4-6 10-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Loge
Player
Ali Yazdani
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve %
74%
(
46 of
62)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 2-6 6-3 11-9 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 3-6 6-3 10-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Daniel Uta Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Andrey Chepelev
Player
Daniel Uta
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
50%
(
22 of
44)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 2-6 10-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(3) 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Daniel Uta
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
93%
(
25 of
27)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
9 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kaya Arinc
Player
Daniel Uta
76%
(
52 of
68)
1st Serve %
50%
(
33 of
66)
9
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
52%
(
27 of
52)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
53%
(
36 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
43 of
66)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Uta
Player
Zekai Li
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (32/22) | Win/Loss | 40% (18/27) |
| 56% (68/54) | Sets Win/Loss | 39% (37/57) |
| 53% (626/548) | Games Win/Loss | 45% (369/450) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 76 | Aces Total | 33 |
| 0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 |
| 74 | Total Double Faults | 43 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 190.63 | Average Opponent Rank | 143.09 |
| 62% (1115/1810) | 1st Serve % | 60% (594/985) |
| 65% (729/1115) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (332/594) |
| 48% (332/695) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (152/391) |
| 43% (63/145) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (42/87) |
| 38% (675/1754) | Return Points Win % | 40% (378/953) |
| 59% (32/54) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 39% (17/44) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (4/8) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 67% (4/6) |
| 71% (10/14) | Deciding Set Win % | 40% (2/5) |
| 94% (31/29) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (16/16) |
| 6% (31/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (16/0) |
| 13% (23/3) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 3% (29/1) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
